Statement and Conclusion

The questions below have given four statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II, and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows.

Statements :
Some fuels are ice.
Some ices are states.
Some states are cold.
All cold is fast.
Conclusions :
I. Some cold being fuel is a possibility.
II. Some ice are cold.
III. Some fast being fuel is a possibility.

The question given below has six statements is followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the six given statements to be true (even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts) read the conclusions and decide which logically follows.

Statements -
All trees are flowers.
Some flowers are pencils
All pencils are tables.
All tables are bricks.
No brick is a door.
Some doors are not ropes.
Conclusions -
(I) Some bricks are flowers
(II) All tables being doors is a possibility

In each question below are three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows the three statements disregard commonly known facts. Give answer (1) if only conclusion I follows. Give answer (2) if only conclusion II follows. Give answer (3) if either conclusion I or conclusion II follows Give answer (4) if neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follow Give answer (5) if both conclusion I and conclusion II follow

Statements:Some stars are moons
All moons are planets
No planet is universe
Conclusions:I.All moons being universe is a possibility
II.No universe is star

In the question below are given four statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true (even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts). Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows.

Statements:
Some cars are days.
Some roads are nights.
All days are buses.
Some buses are cars.
Conclusions:
I. Some nights not being buses is a possibility.
II. Some nights are cars.
III. Some days are not buses.

In the question below four statements are followed by four conclusions numbered I, II, III and IV. You have to take the givens statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.

Statements:
Some cats are tigers.
All lions are cats.
Some horses are lions.
All horses are animals.

Conclusions:
I. Some lions are tigers.
II. No horse is tiger.
III. Some horses are cats.
IV. Some horses are tigers.

In each question given below three statements are followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read the conclusions and decide which logically follows from the three given statements disregarding commonly known facts :

Statements: 

All cars are boats.

No boat is ship.

All ships are jeep.

Conclusions:

I. Some jeeps are not the boat. 

II. At least some boats are cars.

Below is given a passage followed by several possible inferences which can be drawn from the fact stated in the passage. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.
Mark answer a) if the inference is 'definitely true', i.e. it properly follows from the statement of facts given. Mark.
Mark answer b) if the inference is 'probably true' though not 'definitely true' in the light of the fact given.
Mark answer c) if the 'data are inadequate', i.e. from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false.
Mark answer d) if the inference is 'probably false', though not 'definitely false' in the light of the facts given.
Mark answer e) if the inference is definitely false', i.e. it cannot possibly be drawn from the fact given or it contradicts the given facts.
In a mature market economy, finance must interact productively with the decision making of private economic agents and shape the resource allocation emerging out of these decisions as efficiently as possible. But Indian finance has a history of financial preemption. Formerly, the task of finance was seen as mobilizing resources for the implementation of socialism at two levels : first, to fund fiscal deficits on below market terms and second, to direct the supply of resources into socially important areas under the guidance of planners rather than the rules of the market. Most policy making in finance in past decades, has been shaped by financial repression, i.e. forcing finance to allocate-resources based not on economic efficiency but to channel it in ways sought by the state. Strong elements of financial repression continue to be in place; e.g. the lack of a properly functioning bond market. Flaws in competition policy, segmentation and barriers to innovation, are rooted in this deeper system of appropriation by the state of financial resources.

Financial policymakers in India attachmore importance to fulfill social objectives than objectivity

Directions: In each question below are given two statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements:

All locks are keys.
No key is a spoon.
Conclusions:

I. No lock is a spoon.
II. No spoon is a lock.

In each of the questions below are given three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read both the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Give answer:
(1) If only conclusion I is true.
(2) If only conclusion II is true.
(3) If either conclusion I or conclusion II is true.
(4) If neither conclusion I nor conclusion II is true
(5) If both conclusions I and II are true.
Statements:
Some mangoes are orange.
Some bananas are mangoes.
Conclusions:
I. Some mangoes are green.
II. Some bananas are orange.

The question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

Statement: A large section of labourers in India is of unorganized field. Most of them earn minimum or uncertain wages and find only insufficient and small jobs.

Conclusions:

I. The labourers of organised field avail the advantage of better facilities and stability in a job.

II. Some labourers of the unorganized field have a regular and certain income.

In each question below given a statement and two conclusions. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true and consider both the conclusion together, then decide which of the two given conclusions logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.
Statement:- Pen is more powerful than the sword.
Conclusions:-
(I) Pen is made of more strong material as compared to a sword.
(II) Brainpower is more powerful than physical body power.

The question given below has six statements are followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the six given statements to be true (even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts) read the conclusions and decide which logically follows.

Statements:
All trees are flowers.
Some flowers are pencils
All pencils are tables.
All tables are bricks.
No brick is a door.
Some doors are not ropes.
Conclusion :
(I) All flowers being doors is a possibility
(II) All ropes being tables is a possibility

The questions below are given four statements followed by four conclusions numbered I, II, III, and IV, You have to take the given statements to be true (even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts.) Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows.

Statements :
Some water is boys.
All boys are girls.
All girls are naughty.
Some naughties are lovely.
Conclusions :
I. Some lovely are boys.
II. Some naughties are not water.
III. Some girls are water.
IV. Some lovely is not water.

In each question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.
(1) If only conclusion I follows
(2) If only conclusion II follows
(3) If either I or II follows
(4) If neither I nor II follows and
(5) If both I and II follow.

Statements:
All those political prisoners were released on bail who had gone to jail for reasons other than political dharnas. Bail was not granted to persons involved in murders.
Conclusions:
I. No political - prisoner had committed murder.
II.Some politicians were not arrested.

In each question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.
(1) If only conclusion I follows
(2) If only conclusion II follows
(3) If either I or II follows
(4) If neither I nor II follows and
(5) If both I and II follow.

Statements:
Modern man influences his destiny by the choice he makes unlike in the past.
Conclusions:
I. Earlier there were fewer options available to man.
II.There was no desire in the past to influence the destiny.

Answer the following questions on the basis of the reasoning or argument contained in the passage given.

The commercial news media overemphasis, exceptional events such as plane crashes at the expense of those such as automobile accidents, which occur far more frequently and represent a far greater risk to the public. Yet the public tends to interpret the degree of emphasis the news media give to these occurrences, the degree of risk they represent.
If the statements above are true, which one of the following conclusions is most strongly supported by them?

In the following questions, the numbers 3, 7, 9, 0, and 4 are used with the following meaning as illustrated below;
'A 3 S' means 'A is not smaller than S'.
'A 7 S' means 'A is neither smaller than nor greater than S'.
'A 9 S' means 'A is neither greater than nor equal to S'.
'A 0 S' means 'A is not greater than S'.
'A 4 S' means 'A is neither smaller than nor equal to S'.
Now in each of the following questions assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the two conclusions I and II given below them is/are definitely true and give your answer accordingly.

Statements: E 9 C, C 7 P, Y 3 P

Conclusions:

I. C 0 Y

II. E 9 Y

Read the following information carefully and answer the question which follow:
Small brands are now looking beyond local grocery stores and are tying up with supermarkets such as Big Bazaar to pull their business out of troubled waters.

Which of the following can be inferred from the given information? (As, inference is something that is not directly stated but can be inferred from the given information)

In each question below given a statement and two conclusions. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true and consider both the conclusion together, then decide which of the two given conclusions logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. Give answer -

Statement :
In a one day cricket match, the total runs made by a team were 200. Out of these 160 runs were made by spinners.
Conclusions :
I. 80% of the team consists of spinners.
II. The opening batsmen were spinners.

The question below is given with four statements followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the four statements to be true (even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts). Read the conclusions and decide which logically follows.

Statements:
All IF is BUT.
All BUT are WHY
Some WHY is HOW
All HOW are WHICH
Conclusions:
I. Some WHICH being BUT is a possibility.
II. Some BUT are HOW.